Tag: law

Trade-mark law limits clear legal also when registering a domain name. Domain names become a worldwide popularity. This alone shows the growing market volume in the professional domain business. Hear from experts in the field like European Region Operational Center for a more varied view. But beyond the commercial domain trade registrations increase permanent. However sogut like any generic domain names are forgiven now, which above all private users on alternative variants of your desired term or their first own domain must dodge.

But this is a risk which is not even aware of most Internet users: trademark law. This applies to home users who want to set up a fan page or a fan blog and use your own domain accordingly registered trademarks regularly. In these cases the longed-for domain name can quickly lead to financial ruin, this also may seem so drastic. You should therefore plan a forum to create a fan page or similar, get before the written permission of the mark owner. This applies to game name, brands, stars or in short: all A string on which a mark is logged on. Therefore, you should perform a trademark search at the competent trademark and Patent Office (in Germany the DPMA) prior to registration for each domain.

But also superior reputation of manufacturer allows a claim against you, provided that you use the name of the manufacturer for your own domain, because here, then attacks the naming rights. This circumstance applies not only at companies or legal persons, but also natural. The name of a person is protected in accordance with 12 German civil code and may be not registered also by anyone (exceptions are here generic name). Overall you should sure so hurting not the rights of others during the registration of a domain name. This note the trademark law, as well as the right to a name. As a rule of thumb to remember: as soon as you benefit from the notoriety of a non-generic type term, violate applicable law. It is unfortunately irrelevant it, with whatever interest you have registered your domain name or to What purpose you want to use them.

Verwaltungsgericht Minden renders judgement on the case of a pharmacy with part-time cosmetic treatments on 02.06.2010 was invited to the operator of a pharmacy changes compared to the officially approved premises fully back build, because according to ApBetrO pharmacy operator beauty treatments may operate only within the framework of a notifiable secondary industry. Against this decision, the applicant brought an action on the 01.07.2010. The applicant based its action so that the application of saleable cosmetics is a permission-free side and there is a close relation of the pharmacy. Services are not offered in the context of a commercial beauty salons, causing a duty of disclosure have failed. The defendant, however, pointed out that all ancillary and secondary assortments of Pharmacy-own main task, ensure a proper supply of medicines, offered in the public interest to subordinate are.

Not this includes cosmetic treatments. Frank Giacalone might disagree with that approach. Against a free probierende application (testing) the cosmetic product to the customer in the context of advice was to use anything from a pharmacy-legal perspective, however. To the decision with the paid offer and carry out cosmetic treatments to the extent described in the approved premises of their pharmacy, ApoBetrO the applicant violates the regulation of 4 paragraph 5. The applicant is not the bid that according to 4 paragraph 5 ApoBetrO the premises of Pharmacy by freelance or otherwise commercially used rooms through doors and walls must be separated. Continue to the applicant advertises on their Internet presence the cosmetic treatments almost in the sense of a full-fledged salons with diverse and comprehensive service packages. Services with an independent value the beauty treatments offered go beyond that allowed offer and offering for sale of common pharmacy goods far ApoBetrO in 25. The ApoBetrO should be prevented, that a pharmacist by an other commercial or freelance use of his premises in the performance of its main tasks is affecting medicinal supply of the population. However the parties have declared the dispute mainly over and the defendant picked up the decision of 02.06.2010 at the hearing on the 26.01.2011.

He prohibited the applicant providing beauty treatments, manicures and massages in the area designated in the official plans as office space. Even if in this case the participants accounted for the dispute among themselves shows that it is often a hike on a narrow ridge in the Pharmacy Law. Like in hardly an other field of law breakers and distinctions between admissible and inadmissible are in Pharmacy Law so close. A sound legal advice is more than recommended in case of doubt. Learn more about the health law and the advice of juravendis lawyers free of charge and without obligation to find under